Posted in Disbarred Attorneys, Thurston County

Daniel A Wright

Daniel A. Wright
License Number: 11560
License Type: Lawyer
Eligible To Practice: No
License Status: Disbarred
WSBA Admit Date: 5/11/1981
Contact Information
Public/Mailing Address: 1007 Maplewood Ln SE
Tumwater, WA 98501-4149
Phone: (360) 352-4674
Practice Information Identified by Legal Professional
Firm or Employer:
Office Type and Size: Law firm with 2-5 WSBA members
Practice Areas: Estate Planning/ Probate/ Wills, Family
Languages Other Than English: None Specified
Professional Liability Insurance
Private Practice: Yes
Has Insurance? Yes – Click for more info
Last Updated: 3/7/2008 8:00:00 AM
Committees
Member of these committees/boards/panels:
None
Disciplinary History
Action Effective Date
Disbarment 10/06/2009

In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents.

Discipline Notice – Daniel Wright
License Number: 11560
Member Name: Daniel Wright
Discipline Detail
Action: Disbarment
Effective Date: 10/6/2009
RPC: 1.3 – Diligence
1.4 – Communication
8.1 – Bar Admission Matters
8.4 (c) – Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit or Misrepresentation
8.4 (l) – Violate ELCs
Discipline Notice:
Description: Daniel A. Wright (WSBA No. 11560, admitted 1981), of Tumwater was disbarred, effective October 6, 2009, by order of the Washington State Supreme Court, following a default hearing. This discipline was based on conduct involving failure to act with reasonable diligence, failure to communicate, making false statements in connection with a disciplinary matter, dishonest conduct, and violating a duty imposed under the Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct.

In September 2005, a client hired Mr. Wright to represent her in the dissolution of her marriage. As part of the dissolution, the client’s husband executed a promissory note in favor of the client, which was secured by a trust deed on a certain piece of real property. The client’s husband executed the note and trust deed on or about February 1, 2007. Mr. Wright did not record the promissory note or trust deed. In June 2007, the client retrieved her client file from the firm where Mr. Wright was an associate. She subsequently learned that the trust deed had not been recorded and that a senior lien holder had foreclosed on the property on May 7, 2007.

On August 14, 2007, the client telephoned Mr. Wright about his failure to record the trust deed. Mr. Wright told his client that she had instructed him not to record the trust deed and that he had sent her a letter at that time confirming those instructions. The client told Mr. Wright that she had not given him instructions not to record the trust deed. She also told Mr. Wright that she had not received any letter from him confirming those instructions and that she intended to file a grievance with the Association. Mr. Wright wrote and sent the client a follow-up letter confirming the telephone conversation, including his assertion that she instructed him not to record the trust deed, and enclosed a copy of a letter dated February 12, 2007. The letter dated February 12, 2007, from Mr. Wright to the client, purported to confirm the client’s instructions to Mr. Wright not to file the trust deed. Mr. Wright represented to her that the letter had been created and mailed to her on February 12, 2007. In fact, Mr. Wright created the letter on August 14, 2007, after the telephone conversation with the client. In connection with the investigation of the grievance filed by the client, Mr. Wright falsely stated to the Association that the letter dated February 12, 2007, had been created and sent to the client on February 12, 2007.

Mr. Wright’s conduct violated RPC 1.3, requiring a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; RPC 1.4, requiring a lawyer to promptly inform the client of any decision of circumstance with respect to which the client’s informed consent is required, reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished, keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; RPC 8.1(a), prohibiting a lawyer, in connection with a disciplinary matter, from knowingly making a false statement of material fact; RPC 8.4(c), prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; and RPC 8.4(l), prohibiting a lawyer from violating a duty or sanction imposed by or under the Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct in connection with a disciplinary matter (here, ELC 5.3(e)).

Debra J. Slater represented the Bar Association. Mr. Wright did not appear either in person or through counsel. Malcolm L. Edwards was the hearing officer.

In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents.

Posted in Disbarred Attorneys, Spokane County

Robert Neil Dompier

Robert Neil Dompier
License Number: 10871
License Type: Lawyer
Eligible To Practice: No
License Status: Disbarred
WSBA Admit Date: 7/8/1980
Contact Information
Public/Mailing Address: 4005 N Marguerite Rd
Spokane, WA 99212-1818
Phone: (509) 216-1411
Fax: (509) 893-3740
Practice Information Identified by Legal Professional
Firm or Employer:
Office Type and Size: Not Specified
Practice Areas: None Specified
Languages Other Than English: None Specified
Professional Liability Insurance
Private Practice:
Has Insurance? – Click for more info
Last Updated:
Committees
Member of these committees/boards/panels:
None
Disciplinary History
Action Effective Date
Disbarment 05/15/2008
In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents.

Discipline Notice – Robert Dompier
License Number: 10871
Member Name: Robert Dompier
Discipline Detail
Action: Disbarment
Effective Date: 5/15/2008
RPC: 8.4 (b) – Criminal Act
8.4 (c) – Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit or Misrepresentation
8.4 (i) – Moral Turpitude
8.4 (l) – Violate ELCs
Discipline Notice:
Description: Robert Neil Dompier (WSBA No. 10871, admitted 1980), of Spokane, was disbarred, effective May 15, 2008, by order of the Washington State Supreme Court following approval of a stipulation. This discipline is based on conduct involving theft, dishonest conduct, violating a duty imposed by the Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct (ELCs), and acts of moral turpitude.

Mr. Dompier’s grandparents established funds during their lifetimes for the education of their great-grandchildren. Mr. Dompier’s father managed the funds until 1996. In 1996, Mr. Dompier assumed management of the funds and deposited them into individual accounts for his children and those of his three brothers. Individual trust accounts were established in the names of each child pursuant to the Washington Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, RCW 11.114.090 et seq. Mr. Dompier was custodian of each of the accounts and maintained complete authority over management of the accounts.

In 1999, Mr. Dompier began investing in real estate. He purchased various pieces of real property as investments owned in Mr. Dompier’s and his wife’s name. Mr. Dompier’s investment plan entailed his managing the properties for a fee. The income produced by the properties would cover the expenses associated with the properties. As the values of the properties increased, Mr. Dompier planned to sell the properties. Mr. Dompier’s plan did not work out as expected, and soon expenses began to exceed the income associated with the real estate properties. In 2000, Mr. Dompier began experiencing financial difficulties and began withdrawing funds to which he was not entitled from the custodial accounts and deposited the funds into his own personal accounts, using some of the funds for his own personal use, thereby unlawfully converting the funds. (Mr. Dompier specifically does not admit this conduct but does admit that there is a substantial likelihood the WSBA could prove it by a clear preponderance of the evidence.) By September 2003, all of the accounts were depleted of all funds and subsequently closed. Despite the use of the converted funds, Mr. Dompier continued to experience financial difficulties.

In March 2004, Mr. Dompier wrote a letter to his brothers, nieces, and nephews acknowledging that he had used the money in the custodial accounts. He apologized and indicated that he would pay the money back, which totaled approximately $47,731. In July 2004, Mr. Dompier and his wife filed personal bankruptcy. Mr. Dompier’s brothers were listed as creditors to whom Mr. Dompier owed money. These debts were for the funds Mr. Dompier took from the custodial accounts. As part of his personal bankruptcy, Mr. Dompier filed reaffirmation agreements with his brothers that reaffirmed the debt Mr. Dompier owed for the funds he withdrew from the accounts in a total amount of $48,331. In November 2004, a final decree was filed and Mr. Dompier’s bankruptcy case was closed. Mr. Dompier has not made any payments or reimbursed his brothers or his nieces and nephews for the funds he took from the custodial accounts.

In July 2006, the Association mailed the grievance to Mr. Dompier and requested that he submit a written response within two weeks. In August 2007, Mr. Dompier filed a response to the grievance stating that he had invested the funds in rental real estate on behalf of the beneficiaries, but that the real estate had been lost to foreclosure. Mr. Dompier’s response was not complete or truthful in that his real estate investments were made in his and his wife’s name, not in the name of the trust beneficiaries, and Mr. Dompier did not invest the funds withdrawn from the custodial accounts in rental real estate.

Mr. Dompier’s conduct violated RPC 8.4(b), prohibiting a lawyer from committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; RPC 8.4(c), prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; RPC 8.4(l), prohibiting a lawyer from violating a duty or sanction imposed by or under the Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct in connection with a disciplinary matter (here ELC 5.3(e)); and RPC 8.4(i), prohibiting a lawyer from committing any act involving moral turpitude, or corruption, or any other act which reflects disregard for the rule of law, whether the same be committed in the course of his or her conduct as a lawyer, or otherwise.

Debra J. Slater represented the Bar Association. Mr. Dompier represented himself.

In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents.